8 lines
25 KiB
JSON
8 lines
25 KiB
JSON
{"name": "invoice-extraction", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.0355258819981827, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-97f2f9db782a56c7", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741940, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\n \"supplier\": \"North Star Ltd\",\n \"currency\": \"CNY\",\n \"total\": 476,\n \"due_date\": \"2026-10-03\"\n}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "We need answer user's request. Need extract invoice to JSON with keys supplier, currency, total, due_date. Need compute total: 3*125=375, 2*48=96, shipping 20, discount 15. total = 375+96+20-15=476. integer. Reply only JSON. Ensure valid JSON.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 132, "total_tokens": 273, "completion_tokens": 141, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 88}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|
|
{"name": "deduplicate", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.6953456259943778, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-abd0cde7f72766b6", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741942, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"ids\":[\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"],\"total\":48}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "We need answer user's request. Need produce final ONLY JSON. Need parse input orders:\nA pending 12; B paid 20; A paid 15; C cancelled 99; D paid 8; B paid 25.\nKeep last occurrence of each ID, discard cancelled orders, output ONLY JSON {\"ids\":[...],\"total\":...}. Sort IDs alphabetically.\nNeed determine last occurrence per ID:\nA: pending 12 then paid 15 -> last A paid 15.\nB: paid 20 then paid 25 -> last B paid 25.\nC: cancelled 99 -> discard cancelled orders. Does discard cancelled orders mean if last occurrence cancelled discard ID. Yes.\nD: paid 8.\nRemaining IDs A,B,D sorted alphabetically: [\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"]. total sum amounts? likely total of kept orders: 15+25+8=48. Output JSON only.\nNeed ensure no extra text.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 120, "total_tokens": 352, "completion_tokens": 232, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 215}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|
|
{"name": "schedule", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.9469835909985704, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-a5decb7e8dab5319", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741943, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\n \"earliest_finish\": 10,\n \"critical_path\": [\"A\", \"B\", \"D\"]\n}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "We need answer user's request. Need parse problem. \"Jobs A takes 3 hours; B takes 5 hours after A; C takes 4 hours after A; D takes 2 hours after both B and C. Unlimited workers, start at hour 0. Output only JSON with earliest_finish and critical_path (array of job letters).\"\n\nWe need compute earliest finish times and critical path. Jobs: A duration 3, starts at 0, finish 3. B after A duration 5, earliest start 3, finish 8. C after A duration 4, earliest start 3, finish 7. D after both B and C duration 2, earliest start max(8,7)=8, finish 10. Critical path longest path: A->B->D length 3+5+2=10. A->C->D length 3+4+2=9. So critical_path [\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"]. earliest_finish likely 10. Output only JSON. Need ensure valid JSON. Maybe {\"earliest_finish\":10,\"critical_path\":[\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"]}. No extra text.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 110, "total_tokens": 382, "completion_tokens": 272, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 240}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|
|
{"name": "chinese-policy", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.7482620220034732, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-a734cdf1ce25a052", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741945, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\n \"甲\": \"主管\",\n \"乙\": \"经理\",\n \"丙\": \"经理\",\n \"丁\": \"总监\"\n}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "We need answer user's request. Need produce final only JSON. Need parse Chinese:\nInstitution: amount <=5000 supervisor; >5000 and <=20000 manager; >20000 director. Urgent doesn't change approver.\nApplications: 甲5000, 乙5001加急, 丙20000, 丁20001.\nMap:\n甲 5000 <=5000 -> 主管\n乙 5001 >5000 <=20000 -> 经理 (urgent no change)\n丙 20000 <=20000 -> 经理\n丁 20001 >20000 -> 总监\nOutput only JSON keys 甲乙丙丁 values. Ensure valid JSON. Could be {\"甲\":\"主管\",\"乙\":\"经理\",\"丙\":\"经理\",\"丁\":\"总监\"}.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 148, "total_tokens": 395, "completion_tokens": 247, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 209}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|
|
{"name": "merge-intervals", "passed": true, "validation_stdout": "passed\n", "validation_stderr": "", "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-92462b083906ddc5", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741947, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\n \"code\": \"def merge_intervals(intervals):\\n normalized = []\\n for interval in intervals:\\n start = min(interval[0], interval[1])\\n end = max(interval[0], interval[1])\\n normalized.append([start, end])\\n if not normalized:\\n return []\\n normalized.sort()\\n merged = []\\n current = normalized[0].copy()\\n for i in range(1, len(normalized)):\\n interval = normalized[i]\\n if interval[0] <= current[1]:\\n if interval[1] > current[1]:\\n current[1] = interval[1]\\n else:\\n merged.append(current)\\n current = interval.copy()\\n merged.append(current)\\n return merged\"\n}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "We need answer user's request. Need produce final ONLY JSON object with a code string. Need satisfy constraints: Write Python function merge_intervals. Merge overlapping integer intervals, including touching endpoints. Return sorted merged intervals as lists. Reply ONLY a JSON object with a code string. Use no imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions. Allowed builtins: sorted,len,range,min,max,list,enumerate,sum. Allowed methods: append,sort,copy.\n\nNeed output JSON object likely {\"code\": \"def merge_intervals(...): ...\"} only. Need ensure code string valid Python. No imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions. Function only. Allowed builtins only sorted,len,range,min,max,list,enumerate,sum. Allowed methods append,sort,copy. Need be careful not use other builtins like bool, int, str, tuple? We can use literals. Need no type annotations. Need no helper functions. Need merge intervals input likely list of intervals [start,end] or tuples? Return sorted merged intervals as lists. Need handle empty input. Need sort by start. Need merge if next start <= current end + 1? Touching endpoints: intervals [1,2] and [2,3] overlap/touch? \"including touching endpoints\" means if start <= end (overlap) or start == end+1? Actually touching endpoints could mean [1,2] and [2,3] share endpoint 2, so merge if start <= current_end. But \"including touching endpoints\" might also mean adjacent intervals [1,2] and [3,4] touch? In integer intervals, endpoints touching? Usually intervals [1,2] and [2,3] touch at 2. If integer intervals inclusive, [1,2] and [3,4] are adjacent but not touching endpoints? They don't share endpoint, but gap? There is no integer between 2 and 3? Actually inclusive integer intervals [1,2] and [3,4] are contiguous but endpoints not touching? If considering continuous intervals, [1,2] and [3,4] have gap (2,3). If integer intervals, they are adjacent with no missing integer? But phrase \"including touching endpoints\" likely means merge if start <= end (overlap or share endpoint). For integer intervals, touching endpoints could be [1,2] and [2,3]. If they wanted adjacent merge, they'd say adjacent or no gap. Need decide. \"Merge overlapping integer intervals, including touching endpoints.\" Overlapping including touching endpoints means intervals that touch at endpoint are considered overlapping. So condition start <= current_end. If start == current_end + 1, not touching endpoints (unless integer adjacency? endpoints 2 and 3 not same). But maybe \"touching endpoints\" means [1,2] and [3,4] endpoints 2 and 3 touch? No, endpoints are values, not physical. Could be ambiguous. Many interval merge problems merge if start <= end (overlap) and sometimes if start <= end + 1 for adjacent. \"including touching endpoints\" often means [1,2] and [2,3] merge. So use <=.\n\nNeed code only function. Could implement:\ndef merge_intervals(intervals):\n if not intervals:\n return []\n sorted_intervals = sorted(intervals)\n merged = []\n current = list(sorted_intervals[0])\n for i in range(1, len(sorted_intervals)):\n interval = sorted_intervals[i]\n if interval[0] <= current[1]:\n if interval[1] > current[1]:\n current[1] = interval[1]\n else:\n merged.append(current)\n current = list(interval)\n merged.append(current)\n return merged\n\nBut uses list builtin allowed. sorted allowed. len, range allowed. No type annotations. No helper. Need no top-level statements. This is top-level function definition only. Is function definition considered top-level statement? They likely mean no code outside function. Allowed. Need no imports.\n\nNeed ensure if intervals are tuples, sorted works. current = list(sorted_intervals[0]) returns list. interval[0] works. If input intervals are lists, sorted sorts by first then second. Good.\n\nNeed maybe handle intervals with start > end? Not specified. Could normalize? But no helper. Could use min/max allowed. But if intervals invalid? Not necessary. But robust: for interval in sorted_intervals: start = min(interval[0], interval[1]); end = max(...). But sorted by original may not sort normalized. Could create normalized list? Need no extra builtins? Could use list comprehension? List comprehension is syntax, not builtin. But allowed? It doesn't use disallowed builtins. But maybe simpler. If normalize, need sort normalized. Could do:\ndef merge_intervals(intervals):\n normalized = []\n for interval in intervals:\n start = min(interval[0], interval[1])\n end = max(interval[0], interval[1])\n normalized.append([start, end])\n if not normalized:\n return []\n normalized.sort()\n merged = []\n current = normalized[0].copy()\n for i in range(1, len(normalized)):\n interval = normalized[i]\n if interval[0] <= current[1]:\n if interval[1] > current[1]:\n current[1] = interval[1]\n else:\n merged.append(current)\n current = interval.copy()\n merged.append(current)\n return merged\n\nUses min,max,append,sort,copy. No sorted? allowed. No list? not needed. But if input empty, normalized empty. Need if not normalized uses truthiness, no builtin. Is `if not normalized` allowed? It's syntax. Good. But if intervals is generator? Input likely list. If generator, for interval in intervals works, but len not used. Good.\n\nNeed consider touching endpoints: condition interval[0] <= current[1]. If want adjacent merge, condition interval[0] <= current[1] + 1. Which one? Need maybe include touching endpoints as start <= current_end + 1? Let's parse: \"Merge overlapping integer intervals, including touching endpoints.\" If intervals are integer intervals, endpoints are integers. Touching endpoints could mean [1,2] and [2,3] share endpoint 2. That's start == current_end. If [1,2] and [3,4], endpoints 2 and 3 are consecutive but not touching? In discrete integer line, they are adjacent with no integer gap. Some definitions of integer intervals consider [1,2] and [3,4] touching? They don't overlap, but union covers [1,4] with no missing integer. If merging integer intervals, often merge if next_start <= current_end + 1 to merge adjacent integer intervals. The phrase \"including touching endpoints\" might be intended to merge [1,2] and [2,3] (touching at endpoint) not [1,2] and [3,4]. But \"integer intervals\" maybe endpoints inclusive, touching endpoints means next_start <= current_end + 1? Let's think.\n\nIf intervals are integer ranges inclusive, [1,2] and [3,4] do not share an endpoint, but they are contiguous. If you draw integer points, 2 and 3 are adjacent points, not touching? If intervals as closed intervals on real line, [1,2] and [3,4] have gap. If \"touching endpoints\" means endpoints equal, condition <=. If \"including touching endpoints\" in interval merging often means if intervals are [1,2] and [2,3], merge. So <=.\n\nBut some tasks: \"Merge overlapping intervals, including touching endpoints\" means [1,2] and [2,3] merge. They don't mention adjacent. So <=.\n\nNeed output JSON only. Need escape newlines in code string. Could output compact code string with \\n. JSON object: {\"code\":\"def merge_intervals(intervals):\\n normalized = []\\n for interval in intervals:\\n start = min(interval[0], interval[1])\\n end = max(interval[0], interval[1])\\n normalized.append([start, end])\\n if not normalized:\\n return []\\n normalized.sort()\\n merged = []\\n current = normalized[0].copy()\\n for i in range(1, len(normalized)):\\n interval = normalized[i]\\n if interval[0] <= current[1]:\\n if interval[1] > current[1]:\\n current[1] = interval[1]\\n else:\\n merged.append(current)\\n current = interval.copy()\\n merged.append(current)\\n return merged\"}\n\nNeed ensure no disallowed builtins. Uses min, max, len, range. Methods append, sort, copy. Good. No sorted? allowed but not used. No list? not used. No enumerate, sum. Good.\n\nPotential issue: `if not normalized:` uses not, fine. `normalized[0].copy()` method copy allowed. `interval.copy()` allowed. If input intervals are tuples, normalized elements are lists. Good. If input intervals are lists, we copy to avoid mutating input? current = normalized[0].copy(); normalized elements are new lists anyway, but copy okay. If input intervals are lists, normalized.append([start,end]) new lists. Good.\n\nPotential issue: If intervals contains empty interval? interval[0] error. Not specified.\n\nPotential issue: If intervals is None? error. Not specified.\n\nNeed maybe use sorted instead of sort? sort allowed. Good.\n\nNeed no type annotations. Good.\n\nNeed no top-level statements: only function def. Good.\n\nNeed JSON valid. Code string contains double quotes? No. Contains backslashes? We need escape newlines as \\n in JSON. Final should be raw JSON text. Ensure no trailing commas. Could include code with actual newlines inside JSON string? JSON strings cannot contain literal newlines unless escaped. So use \\n. Need maybe tabs? Use spaces. Good.\n\nNeed maybe include only JSON object, no markdown. Final only JSON.\n\nDouble-check constraints: \"Allowed builtins: sorted,len,range,min,max,list,enumerate,sum.\" We use min, max, len, range. Good. \"Allowed methods: append,sort,copy.\" We use append, sort, copy. Good. \"Use no imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions.\" Function definition is top-level? They likely allow function. No helper functions. Good.\n\nCould there be issue with `for interval in intervals:` if intervals is not list but tuple? fine. If intervals is generator, normalized list. Good.\n\nNeed maybe return sorted merged intervals as lists. We return lists. Good.\n\nNeed maybe if input intervals are already sorted? We sort. Good.\n\nNeed maybe merge touching endpoints: if interval[0] <= current[1] + 1? Let's revisit. The phrase: \"Merge overlapping integer intervals, including touching endpoints.\" If intervals are integer intervals, touching endpoints could be [1,2] and [2,3] (overlap at 2). If they wanted adjacent, they'd say \"including adjacent intervals\" or \"touching or adjacent\". But \"touching endpoints\" could mean [1,2] and [3,4] endpoints 2 and 3 touch? In integer domain, there is no integer between 2 and 3, but endpoints are not equal. In continuous domain, they don't touch. \"including touching endpoints\" likely clarifies that intervals that merely touch at a point should be merged, i.e., [1,2] and [2,3]. So <=.\n\nBut if they test [1,2], [3,4], what expected? If they say integer intervals, maybe they expect merge because no gap? Let's search memory: Many coding tasks: \"Merge overlapping intervals, including touching endpoints\" means if intervals are [1,2] and [2,3], merge. For integer intervals, sometimes \"touching\" means [1,2] and [3,4] are touching because 2+1=3? Hmm.\n\nLet's reason from \"including touching endpoints\" exactly. Endpoints are numbers. Two intervals touch if one endpoint equals another endpoint. [1,2] and [2,3] share endpoint 2. [1,2] and [3,4] endpoints 2 and 3 are not equal. So not touching. So <=.\n\nNeed maybe if intervals are [1,2] and [2,2], merge. <=.\n\nCould implement condition `if interval[0] <= current[1] + 1:` to be safe for adjacent? But that would merge [1,2] and [3,4], which may be considered wrong if only touching endpoints. Which is more likely in tests? The phrase \"integer intervals\" might imply inclusive integer ranges, and \"touching endpoints\" might mean [1,2] and [3,4] touch because endpoint 2 and 3 are consecutive? But \"endpoints\" not \"integers\". If they wanted adjacent, they'd say \"including adjacent intervals\". Also \"overlapping ... including touching endpoints\" is standard for closed intervals: touching endpoints are overlapping at a point. So <=.\n\nNeed maybe no use of `not`? It's not builtin. Fine.\n\nCould avoid `if not normalized` by `if len(normalized) == 0:` uses len. But `not` okay. If strict allowed builtins only, `not` is operator. Fine.\n\nNeed maybe no `==`? operator. Fine.\n\nPotential issue: JSON code string with `\n` and spaces. Good.\n\nNeed final only JSON. Ensure no analysis in final. Done.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 123, "total_tokens": 3254, "completion_tokens": 3131, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 2944}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|
|
{"name": "binary-search", "passed": true, "validation_stdout": "passed\n", "validation_stderr": "", "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-9f968e745462b80f", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741971, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"code\":\"def lower_bound(nums, target):\\n lo = 0\\n hi = len(nums)\\n while lo < hi:\\n mid = (lo + hi) // 2\\n if nums[mid] >= target:\\n hi = mid\\n else:\\n lo = mid + 1\\n return lo\"}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "We need answer user's request. Need produce final ONLY JSON object with a code string. Need satisfy constraints: Write Python function lower_bound. Return index first element >= target in sorted list nums, or len(nums) if none. Parameters nums, target. Reply ONLY JSON object with a code string. Use no imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions. Allowed builtins: sorted,len,range,min,max,list,enumerate,sum. Allowed methods: append,sort,copy.\n\nNeed output JSON object likely {\"code\": \"def lower_bound(nums, target):\\n ...\"}. Need ensure no imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions. Function only. Allowed builtins only? We can use len, range. Need binary search. No helper functions. Could use while loop? Are while statements allowed? They didn't forbid control flow. Builtins allowed only? They say Allowed builtins: sorted,len,range,min,max,list,enumerate,sum. Means don't use other builtins like int? We can avoid. Use len, range maybe. Need no type annotations. Code string.\n\nImplement:\ndef lower_bound(nums, target):\n lo = 0\n hi = len(nums)\n while lo < hi:\n mid = (lo + hi) // 2\n if nums[mid] >= target:\n hi = mid\n else:\n lo = mid + 1\n return lo\n\nUses // operator, no builtin. OK. But allowed builtins? // not builtin. Fine. No imports. Top-level statement? The function definition is top-level? They likely mean no statements outside function. Function definition is required. \"no top-level statements or helper functions\" means only function definition. JSON code string.\n\nNeed ensure JSON valid. Escape newlines. Could output compact. Need only JSON object. No markdown. Ensure code string no type annotations. Could include docstring? Not necessary. Need maybe use range? Not needed. Allowed builtins includes len. Good.\n\nPotential issue: JSON string with code containing backslashes? We'll output:\n{\"code\":\"def lower_bound(nums, target):\\n lo = 0\\n hi = len(nums)\\n while lo < hi:\\n mid = (lo + hi) // 2\\n if nums[mid] >= target:\\n hi = mid\\n else:\\n lo = mid + 1\\n return lo\"}\n\nNeed no helper functions. OK.\n\nDouble-check constraints: \"Use no imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions.\" Function definition is top-level? They likely allow function. \"Allowed builtins: sorted,len,range,min,max,list,enumerate,sum.\" We use len. \"Allowed methods: append,sort,copy.\" We use none. Good.\n\nNeed final only JSON. Ensure no trailing newline? fine.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 134, "total_tokens": 809, "completion_tokens": 675, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 599}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|
|
{"name": "tool-arguments", "passed": true, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-8e906ca145675053", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741976, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": null, "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "tool_calls": [{"id": "chatcmpl-tool-abc1109f78d79456", "type": "function", "function": {"name": "create_ticket", "arguments": "{\"title\": \"GPU cooling failure\", \"priority\": \"urgent\", \"asset\": \"GPU-092\"}"}}], "reasoning": "We need to respond by calling create_ticket with exact params. Need final call. Ensure title exactly \"GPU cooling failure\", priority urgent, asset \"GPU-092\".\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "tool_calls", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 363, "total_tokens": 456, "completion_tokens": 93, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 36}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
|