Files
qwen38-flash-next-rtx6000d/audit/qualification/mtp2-quality-medium.jsonl
T

8 lines
14 KiB
JSON

{"name": "invoice-extraction", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.270394352999574, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-929e3376567b7cab", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741977, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"supplier\":\"North Star Ltd\",\"currency\":\"CNY\",\"total\":476,\"due_date\":\"2026-10-03\"}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "The user wants me to extract invoice data into JSON format. Let me parse the information:\n\n- Supplier: North Star Ltd\n- Currency: CNY\n- Rows: 3 items at 125 each = 375, 2 items at 48 each = 96\n- Shipping: 20\n- Discount: 15\n- Total: 375 + 96 + 20 - 15 = 476\n- Due date: 2026-10-03\n\nThe total must be an integer: 476\n\nKeys required: supplier, currency, total, due_date\n\nLet me format as JSON only.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 90, "total_tokens": 275, "completion_tokens": 185, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 150}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
{"name": "deduplicate", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.752616023994051, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-be8642374cd91a1f", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741978, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"ids\":[\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"],\"total\":48}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "Let me process the orders step by step.\n\nInput orders:\n1. A pending 12\n2. B paid 20\n3. A paid 15\n4. C cancelled 99\n5. D paid 8\n6. B paid 25\n\nStep 1: Keep the last occurrence of each ID.\n- A: last occurrence is \"A paid 15\" (order 3)\n- B: last occurrence is \"B paid 25\" (order 6)\n- C: last occurrence is \"C cancelled 99\" (order 4)\n- D: last occurrence is \"D paid 8\" (order 5)\n\nStep 2: Discard cancelled orders.\n- C is cancelled, so discard it.\n- Remaining: A paid 15, B paid 25, D paid 8\n\nStep 3: Sort IDs alphabetically.\n- A, B, D\n\nStep 4: Calculate total.\n- 15 + 25 + 8 = 48\n\nOutput: {\"ids\":[\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"],\"total\":48}\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 78, "total_tokens": 342, "completion_tokens": 264, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 247}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
{"name": "schedule", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 2.0542921800006297, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-9dc5afa7afa9fb38", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741980, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"earliest_finish\":10,\"critical_path\":[\"A\",\"B\",\"D\"]}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "Let me analyze this scheduling problem carefully.\n\nJobs and their durations:\n- A: 3 hours (starts at hour 0)\n- B: 5 hours, starts after A\n- C: 4 hours, starts after A\n- D: 2 hours, starts after both B and C\n\nLet me trace the timeline:\n\n- A starts at hour 0, finishes at hour 3.\n- B starts after A → starts at hour 3, finishes at hour 3+5 = 8.\n- C starts after A → starts at hour 3, finishes at hour 3+4 = 7.\n- D starts after both B and C → starts at max(8, 7) = 8, finishes at 8+2 = 10.\n\nEarliest finish: 10 hours.\n\nCritical path: The longest path through the dependency graph.\n- Path A → B → D: 3 + 5 + 2 = 10\n- Path A → C → D: 3 + 4 + 2 = 9\n\nThe critical path is A → B → D with total duration 10.\n\nSo critical_path = [\"A\", \"B\", \"D\"]\nearliest_finish = 10\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 68, "total_tokens": 359, "completion_tokens": 291, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 271}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
{"name": "chinese-policy", "passed": true, "elapsed_s": 1.3322822580012144, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-b07bc34a010483b7", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741982, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"甲\":\"主管\",\"乙\":\"经理\",\"丙\":\"经理\",\"丁\":\"总监\"}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "让我仔细分析审批制度:\n\n- 金额不超过5000元:主管审批\n- 超过5000且不超过20000:经理审批\n- 超过20000:总监审批\n- 加急不改变审批人\n\n现在分析各申请:\n\n甲:5000元 → 不超过5000 → 主管\n乙:5001元加急 → 超过5000且不超过20000 → 经理(加急不改变审批人)\n丙:20000元 → 超过5000且不超过20000 → 经理\n丁:20001元 → 超过20000 → 总监\n\n输出JSON格式。\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 106, "total_tokens": 295, "completion_tokens": 189, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 169}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
{"name": "merge-intervals", "passed": true, "validation_stdout": "passed\n", "validation_stderr": "", "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-b01102cf94d16554", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741983, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"code\": \"def merge_intervals(intervals):\\n if len(intervals) == 0:\\n return []\\n sorted_intervals = sorted(intervals)\\n merged = [sorted_intervals[0].copy()]\\n for i in range(1, len(sorted_intervals)):\\n current = sorted_intervals[i]\\n last = merged[len(merged) - 1]\\n if current[0] <= last[1]:\\n last[1] = max(last[1], current[1])\\n else:\\n merged.append(current.copy())\\n return merged\"}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "The user wants a Python function `merge_intervals` that merges overlapping integer intervals, including touching endpoints. Let me think about the requirements:\n\n1. Merge overlapping intervals, including touching endpoints (e.g., [1,3] and [3,5] should merge to [1,5])\n2. Return sorted merged intervals as lists\n3. Reply ONLY a JSON object with a code string\n4. No imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions\n5. Allowed builtins: sorted, len, range, min, max, list, enumerate, sum\n6. Allowed methods: append, sort, copy\n\nLet me write the function:\n\n```python\ndef merge_intervals(intervals):\n if len(intervals) == 0:\n return []\n sorted_intervals = sorted(intervals, key=lambda x: x[0])\n merged = [sorted_intervals[0].copy()]\n for i in range(1, len(sorted_intervals)):\n current = sorted_intervals[i]\n last = merged[len(merged) - 1]\n if current[0] <= last[1]:\n last[1] = max(last[1], current[1])\n else:\n merged.append(current.copy())\n return merged\n```\n\nWait, I need to check - can I use lambda? The allowed builtins are: sorted, len, range, min, max, list, enumerate, sum. Lambda isn't explicitly listed but it's a language construct, not a builtin. Let me think... `sorted` with a key function requires a callable. I could use `sorted(intervals)` since lists sort lexicographically by default, which would sort by first element then second element. That works for intervals!\n\nActually, `sorted(intervals)` on a list of lists will sort by the first element, then second element. That's exactly what we need.\n\nLet me also check: can I use `lambda`? It's not a builtin, it's a keyword/expression. The restriction says \"no imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements or helper functions.\" Lambda isn't a helper function per se, it's an anonymous function expression. But to be safe, let me just use `sorted(intervals)` without a key since default sorting of lists works correctly for intervals.\n\nAlso, I need to be careful about `.copy()` - it's in the allowed methods list. And `.append()` and `.sort()` are allowed.\n\nLet me also check: `len(merged) - 1` to get the last index - that's fine.\n\nLet me also make sure I'm not using any disallowed things. No type annotations, no decorators, no top-level statements, no helper functions. The function itself is fine.\n\nLet me format as JSON with a \"code\" key.\n\n```json\n{\"code\": \"def merge_intervals(intervals):\\n if len(intervals) == 0:\\n return []\\n sorted_intervals = sorted(intervals)\\n merged = [sorted_intervals[0].copy()]\\n for i in range(1, len(sorted_intervals)):\\n current = sorted_intervals[i]\\n last = merged[len(merged) - 1]\\n if current[0] <= last[1]:\\n last[1] = max(last[1], current[1])\\n else:\\n merged.append(current.copy())\\n return merged\"}\n```\n\nWait, I should double-check: `sorted(intervals)` on a list of lists like `[[1,3],[2,6],[8,10]]` will sort correctly by first element. Yes, Python's default list comparison is lexicographic, so it compares element by element. This is correct for our use case.\n\nAlso checking: touching endpoints means [1,3] and [3,5] merge. My condition `current[0] <= last[1]` handles this since 3 <= 3 is true.\n\nThis looks good. Let me format the JSON properly.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 81, "total_tokens": 1071, "completion_tokens": 990, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 857}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
{"name": "binary-search", "passed": true, "validation_stdout": "passed\n", "validation_stderr": "", "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-b764c227105ec2c6", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741990, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": "\n\n{\"code\": \"def lower_bound(nums, target):\\n lo = 0\\n hi = len(nums)\\n while lo < hi:\\n mid = (lo + hi) // 2\\n if nums[mid] < target:\\n lo = mid + 1\\n else:\\n hi = mid\\n return lo\"}", "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "reasoning": "The user wants a Python function `lower_bound` that finds the index of the first element >= target in a sorted list `nums`, or `len(nums)` if none exists.\n\nConstraints:\n- Return ONLY a JSON object with a \"code\" string\n- No imports, type annotations, decorators, top-level statements, or helper functions\n- Allowed builtins: sorted, len, range, min, max, list, enumerate, sum\n- Allowed methods: append, sort, copy\n\nLet me write a binary search implementation for lower_bound:\n\n```python\ndef lower_bound(nums, target):\n lo = 0\n hi = len(nums)\n while lo < hi:\n mid = (lo + hi) // 2\n if nums[mid] < target:\n lo = mid + 1\n else:\n hi = mid\n return lo\n```\n\nThis is a standard binary search for lower bound. Let me check constraints:\n- No imports ✓\n- No type annotations ✓\n- No decorators ✓\n- No top-level statements ✓\n- No helper functions ✓\n- Uses `len` which is allowed ✓\n- Uses basic operators and comparisons ✓\n\nNow I need to wrap this in a JSON object with a \"code\" string.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "stop", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 92, "total_tokens": 438, "completion_tokens": 346, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 269}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}
{"name": "tool-arguments", "passed": true, "response": {"id": "chatcmpl-82799dc20b39028e", "object": "chat.completion", "created": 1789741993, "model": "qwen3.8-flash-next", "choices": [{"index": 0, "message": {"role": "assistant", "content": null, "refusal": null, "annotations": null, "audio": null, "function_call": null, "tool_calls": [{"id": "chatcmpl-tool-a38851c145f4f076", "type": "function", "function": {"name": "create_ticket", "arguments": "{\"title\": \"GPU cooling failure\", \"priority\": \"urgent\", \"asset\": \"GPU-092\"}"}}], "reasoning": "The user wants me to create a ticket with specific parameters:\n- title: \"GPU cooling failure\" (exactly)\n- priority: \"urgent\"\n- asset: \"GPU-092\" (exactly)\n\nThis is straightforward - I'll call the create_ticket function with these exact values.\n"}, "logprobs": null, "finish_reason": "tool_calls", "stop_reason": null, "token_ids": null, "routed_experts": null}], "service_tier": null, "system_fingerprint": "vllm-0.3.1.dev3+g0bfc7a15d-9e1c6e32", "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 325, "total_tokens": 447, "completion_tokens": 122, "prompt_tokens_details": null, "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 65}}, "prompt_logprobs": null, "prompt_token_ids": null, "prompt_text": null, "kv_transfer_params": null, "ec_transfer_params": null, "metrics": null}}